La transformación digital en la administración pública: evolución y tendencias de investigación

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61347/psa.v3i1.74

Palabras clave:

Administración pública, bibliometría, e-government, gobernanza digital, transformación digital

Resumen

La transformación digital en la administración pública ha adquirido un rol estratégico a nivel global, revolucionando la manera en que las instituciones gubernamentales operan e interactúan con los ciudadanos. Este proceso ha impulsado mejoras significativas en la eficiencia, efectividad y transparencia de los servicios públicos, promoviendo una mayor participación ciudadana y optimización de los recursos disponibles. La presente investigación analiza la evolución y las tendencias investigativas sobre la transformación digital en el sector público, utilizando un enfoque bibliométrico basado en datos de Scopus. Se identificaron 5077 publicaciones relacionadas, destacando un crecimiento significativo en la producción científica en los últimos años, impulsado por avances tecnológicos y eventos disruptivos como la pandemia de COVID-19. Los resultados muestran una transición temática desde enfoques iniciales centrados en el e-government y la digitalización de procesos básicos hacia áreas más avanzadas como inteligencia artificial, gobernanza digital y sostenibilidad. Mediante el análisis de redes de colaboración, se identificaron autores, instituciones y países clave en la investigación. Estados Unidos, Reino Unido e Italia lideran la colaboración global, mientras que países emergentes como Ecuador y Perú muestran un interés creciente. Además, se clasificaron las perspectivas investigativas en seis clústeres principales, abarcando temas como ontologías semánticas, datos abiertos y la creación de valor público a través de estrategias digitales innovadoras. Por lo tanto, este estudio proporciona un panorama integral y actualizado de la investigación sobre la transformación digital en la administración pública.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Akkaya, C., & Krcmar, H. (2019). Potential use of digital assistants by governments for citizen services: the case of Germany. En C. Yu-Che, F. Salem, & A Zuiderwijk (ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 81-90). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3325112.3325241

Alcaide, L., Rodríguez, M. P., & López, A. M. (2017). Análisis bibliométrico sobre la implementación de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación en las administraciones públicas: Aportaciones y oportunidades de investigación. Innovar, 27(63), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v26n63.60674

AlShehhi, H. R., & Tipu, S. A. (2023). The context, antecedents, processes and outcomes of digital transformation in the public sector: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 15(4), 366-383. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2023.136271

Alwaely, S., Alzubaidi, R., Altaher, A., Tayeb, U., Abusalma, A., Saad, A., Hassan, K., & Darawsheh, S. (2024). Digital transformation and the challenges associated with applying digital technologies in achieving strategic flexibility in public administration: A case study in Jordan. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(3), 1793-1800. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2024.2.009

Amato, F., Fioretto, S., Forgillo, E., Masciari, E., Mazzocca, N., Merola, S., & Napolitano, E. V. (2023). Evolving Justice Sector: An Innovative Proposal for Introducing AI-Based Techniques in Court Offices. En A. Kö, E. Francesconi, A. Asemi, G. Kotsis, A. M. Tjoa, & I. Khalil (Eds.), Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (pp. 75-88). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39841-4_6

Andersen, K. N., Lee, J., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2020). Digital Sclerosis? Wind of Change for Government and the Employees. Digit. Gov.: Res. Pract., 1(1), 9:1-9:14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3360000

Androniceanu, A., & Georgescu, I. (2021). E-Government in European Countries, a Comparative Approach Using the Principal Components Analysis. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(2), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0015

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Bannister, F. (2007). The curse of the benchmark: An assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 171-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307077959

Basile, V., Giacalone, M., & Cozzucoli, P. (2022). The Impacts of Bibliometrics Measurement in the Scientific Community A Statistical Analysis of Multiple Case Studies. Review of European Studies, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v14n3p10

Bellamy, C. (2011). Alive and Well? The ‘Surveillance Society’ and the Coalition. Public Policy and Administration, 26(1), 149-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076710384905

Bilkova, R., Máchová, R., & Lněnička, M. (2015). Evaluating the Impact of Open Data Using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, 22, 29-41. https://n9.cl/as73q

Brys, C. R., & Aldana-Montes, J. F. (2016). A semantic model for electronic government and its enforcement in the Province of Misiones, Argentina. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 12(4), 337-356. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2016.080438

Bundin, M., Martynov, A., & Shireeva, E. (2022). Legal Issues on the Use of “Digital Twin” Technologies for Smart Cities. En A. V. Chugunov, M. Janssen, I. Khodachek, Y. Misnikov, & D. Trutnev (Eds.), Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia (pp. 77-86). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04238-6_7

Buyle, R., De Vocht, L., Van Compernolle, M., De Paepe, D., Verborgh, R., Vanlishout, Z., De Vidts, B., Mechant, P., & Mannens, E. (2016). OSLO: Open standards for linked organizations. En Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia (pp. 126-134). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3014087.3014096

Buyle, R., Van Compernolle, M., De Paepe, D., Scheerlinck, J., Mechant, P., Mannens, E., & Vanlishout, Z. (2018). Semantics in the wild: A digital assistant for Flemish citizens. En Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 1-6). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209421

Büyükkıdık, S. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis: A Tutorial for the Bibliometrix Package in R Using IRT Literature. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1069307

Campmas, A., Iacob, N., & Simonelli, F. (2022). How can interoperability stimulate the use of digital public services? An analysis of national interoperability frameworks and e-Government in the European Union. Data & Policy, 4, e19. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2022.11

Campos, L., & Soares, D. (2014). IFPortal: A Web Portal for the Characterization and Comparison of Government Interoperability Frameworks. International Journal of Web Portals (IJWP), 6(2), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijwp.2014040102

Chakiri, H., Mohajir, M. E., & Assem, N. (2020). A data warehouse hybrid design framework using domain ontologies for local good-governance assessment. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 14(2), 171-203. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-04-2019-0025

Chatfield, A. T., Reddick, C. G., Inan, D. I., & Brajawidagda, U. (2014). E-government, social media, and risk perception communication at the edge of disaster: Findings from the Mt. Sinabung eruption in Indonesia. En Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 153-162). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2612733.2612752

Chiroque-Linares, S. M. (2024). Uso de tecnologías de información para mejorar la calidad de atención en municipalidades: Un estudio bibliométrico. Revista Científica de Sistemas e Informática, 4(1), e558. https://n9.cl/g0n9jy

Cifuentes-Faura, J. (2022). The impact of e-government on transparency in the European Union: A multivariate analysis. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 18(1), 105-118. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2022.119610

Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525

Delgado Fernández, T. (2020). Taxonomía de Transformación Digital. Revista Cubana De Transformación Digital, 1(1), 4–23. https://rctd.uic.cu/rctd/article/view/62

Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R., & Alavoine, C. (2022). Data intelligence and analytics: A bibliometric analysis of human–Artificial intelligence in public sector decision-making effectiveness. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121201

Dill’Erva, I. F. (2021). Retos de la administración pública del bicentenario. Saber Servir: revista de la Escuela Nacional de Administración Pública, 5, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.54774/ss.2021.05.07

Dias, G. P. (2011). Q-Model: Um modelo bidimensional de maturidade para o e-government. Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao, 7, 33-47. https://n9.cl/i6xzk5

Dobrolyubova, E. (2021). Measuring Outcomes of Digital Transformation in Public Administration: Literature Review and Possible Steps Forward. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(1), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2021-0003

Duque, P., & Oliva, E. J. D. (2022). Tendencias emergentes en la literatura sobre el compromiso del cliente: Un análisis bibliométrico. Estudios Gerenciales, 38(162), 120-132. https://n9.cl/cpw7t

Durieux, V., & Gevenois, P. A. (2010). Bibliometric Indicators: Quality Measurements of Scientific Publication. Radiology, 255(2), 342-351. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090626

Dzhusupova, Z., Ojo, A., & Janowski, T. (2009). Organizing and managing knowledge for e-government: Issues, practices and challenges. En International Conference on Knowledge Management and Information Sharing (pp. 1-5). INSTICC Press. https://n9.cl/fxwkns

Eiermann, L., & Walter, S. (2010). Document logistics in the public sector: Integrative handling of physical and digital documents. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 7(2/3), 240-256. https://n9.cl/to5qc

Escobar, F., Almeida, W. H. C., & Varajão, J. (2023). Digital transformation success in the public sector: A systematic literature review of cases, processes, and success factors. Info. Pol., 28(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-211518

Faro, B., Abedin, B., & Cetindamar, D. (2021). Hybrid organizational forms in public sector’s digital transformation: A technology enactment approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(6), 1742-1763. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-03-2021-0126

Fellows, I. (12 de octubre de 2022). Package ‘wordcloud’. https://n9.cl/00lwh

Gomes, H., Zúquete, A., & Días, G. P. (2012). Citizen-side Handling of Life Event Services. En Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 565-570). SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0003936805650570

Goy, A., Magro, D., Casu, M., & Di Tomaso, V. (2013). How Semantic Knowledge can Enhance the Access to PA Online Services. En Proceedings of International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services (pp. 714-718). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2539150.2539218

Gritsenko, D., & Zherebtsov, M. (2021). E-Government in Russia: Plans, Reality, and Future Outlook. En D. Gritsenko, M. Wijermars, & M. Kopotev (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies (pp. 33-51). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42855-6_3

Güngör, D. C., Soybaş, M., Orgun, F., & Özkütük, N. (2025). Educational games in nursing education: A bibliometric and content analysis. Nurse Education in Practice, 82, 104231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104231

Haridy, S., Ismail, R. M., Badr, N., & Hashem, M. (2021). OntoUML Conceptual Model for Egyptian E-Government: Student and Traveler Case Studies. En 2021 Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS) (pp. 506-511). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICIS52592.2021.9694122

Haruna, E. U., Asiedu, W. K., & Bello, L. O. (2025). Mapping the knowledge domain of natural capital and sustainability: A bibliometric analysis using the Scopus database for future research direction. Development and Sustainability in Economics and Finance, 5, 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsef.2024.100035

Holst, M. (2015). The Digital, Strategic and Citizen-Centric Project ‘Genvej’ – Introducing ICT in Gentofte Kommune. En C. Gram, P. Rasmussen, & S. D. Østergaard (Eds.), History of Nordic Computing 4 (pp. 101-108). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17145-6_11

Idoko, J. B., & Ahmed, B. A. (2023). Implementation of Semantic Web Service and Integration of e-Government Based Linked Data. En J. B. Idoko & R. Abiyev (Eds.), Machine Learning and the Internet of Things in Education: Models and Applications (pp. 179-208). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42924-8_13

Irani, Z., Abril, R. M., Weerakkody, V., Omar, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2023). The impact of legacy systems on digital transformation in European public administration: Lesson learned from a multi case analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101784

Ivanova, M., Degtereva, V., & Lukin, G. (2020). Evaluation of Digital Transformation of Government: Russian and international systems of indicators. En Proceedings of the 2019 International SPBPU Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy (pp. 1-8). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372177.3373330

Ivanova, M., & Putintseva, N. (2021). Approaches to Evaluation of Digital Transformation of Government: Comparative Analysis of Indicators in the Central and Eastern European Countries. En Proceedings of the 2nd International Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy (pp. 1-8). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3444465.3444508

Ivanova, T., Kozhyna, A., Lelechenko, A., Derun, T., & Slobozhan, O. (2021). Digital transformation in public administration: Evaluating the adoption and impact of technological innovations in government operations. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias, 3(2024), 1142-1142. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf20241142

Joia, L. A. (2004). Developing Government-to-Government enterprises in Brazil: A heuristic model drawn from multiple case studies. International Journal of Information Management, 24(2), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2003.12.013

Koh, C. E., Ryan, S., & Prybutok, V. R. (2005). Creating Value through Managing Knowledge in an E-Government to Constituency (G2C) Environment. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45(4), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2005.11645853

Lamharhar, H., Chiadmi, D., & Benhlima, L. (2014). How semantic technologies transform e-government domain: A comparative study and framework. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(1), 49-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2013-0023

Lappi, T. M., Aaltonen, K., & Kujala, J. (2019). Project governance and portfolio management in government digitalization. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 13(2), 159-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-11-2018-0068

Lips, M. (2012). E-Government is dead: Long live Public Administration 2.0. Information Polity, 17(3-4), 239-250. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-120292

Loor, I., & Rivadeneira, L. (2024). Exploring Local Challenges Through the Lens of e-Government in Manabi, Ecuador. En 2024 Tenth International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG61611.2024.10702091

Loukis, E., & Charalabidis, Y. (2011). Why do eGovernment Projects Fail? Risk Factors of Large Information Systems Projects in the Greek Public Sector: An International Comparison. International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 7(2), 59-77. https://doi.org/10.4018/jegr.2011040104

Magoutas, B., & Mentzas, G. (2010). SALT: A semantic adaptive framework for monitoring citizen satisfaction from e-government services. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(6), 4292-4300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.071

Medina Chicaiza, P., Chango Guanoluisa, M., Corella Cobos, M., & Guizado Toscano, D. (2023). Transformación digital en las empresas: Una revisión conceptual. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7726439

Metaxiotis, K., & Psarras, J. (2004). E-government: New concept, big challenge, success stories. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 1(2), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2004.005174

Mikhail, B., & Aleksei, M. (2016). Use of Social Media and Blogs by Federal Authorities in Russia: Regulation and Policy. En Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 8-11). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2912160.2912211

Mofleh, S. I., & Wanous, M. (2009). Reviewing existing methods for evaluating e-government websites. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 6(2), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2009.024438

Montecinos, E. (2021). Cuarta revolución industrial y la administración pública en América Latina. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 26(93), 10-32. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=29066223002

Nagell, B. (2011). Computerization of the Norwegian Land Register: An Early Example of Outsourcing and Still a Model for Good Practice. En J. Impagliazzo, P. Lundin, & B. Wangler (Eds.), History of Nordic Computing 3 (pp. 13-21). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23315-9_2

Nunes, F., Monteiro, M. H., & Sequeira, S. (2021). Big data analytics to support digital government public policies (Institute of Social and Political Sciences (ISCSP)). Nova Science Publishers, Inc. https://n9.cl/vvut9

Ojo, A., & Janssen, M. (2014). Workshop about the understanding and improving the uptake and utilization open data. En Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 350-351). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2612733.2612734

Omar, A., El-Haddadeh, R., & Weerakkody, V. (2016). Exploring Digitally Enabled Service Transformation in the Public Sector: Would Institutional and Structuration Theory Concepts Keep the Research Talking? International Journal of Electronic Government Research (IJEGR), 12(4), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2016100101

Ozen, I. (2024). General, social, and intellectual structure of breastfeeding studies in the field of nursing: A bibliometric analysis on R software. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2024.10.036

Patiño, J. C., Mardones, R., González, J., Bermeo, M. C., Gallegos, A. D., Cueto, E. N., & Moreno, G. A. (2022). La transformación digital en la educación superior: Un análisis de tendencias a partir de un análisis bibliométrico. RISTI, (50), 644-656. https://n9.cl/e9r8r

Pazmiño Gavilánez, W. E., Parrales Higuera, M. G., Muñoz Oviedo, L. I., & Jacome Merchan, V. A. (2019). Habilidades directivas fundamentales en la administración pública. RECIMUNDO, 3(3 ESP), Article 3 ESP. https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/3.(3.Esp).noviembre.2019.682-705

Richter, D., Krauß, A.-M., Ebert, S., & Handke, S. (2023). On the Search for Trust: Self-Sovereign Identity and the Public Sector. En G. Auth & T. Pidun (Ed.), Fachtagung Rechts- und Verwaltungsinformatik (pp. 42-54). Gesellschaft für Informatik. https://doi.org/10.18420/rvi2023-024

Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., García, I. M., & Gallego, I. (2011). From emerging to connected e-government: The effects of socioeconomics and internal administration characteristics. The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 11, 85-109. https://n9.cl/mnp7f

Saab, F., Lira, W. R. C., de Souza Alves, C., de Souza Bermejo, P. H., & Borges, G. H. A. (2019). Public Management and Technology: How Can e-Government Strategies Contribute to Greater Efficiency in Public Expenditures? En X.-S. Yang, S. Sherratt, N. Dey, & A. Joshi (Eds.), Third International Congress on Information and Communication Technology (pp. 457-470). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1165-9_43

Salvador Hernández, Y., Llanes Font, M., & Suárez Benítez, M. Á. (2020). Transformación digital en la administración pública: Ejes y factores esenciales. Avances, 22(4), 590-602. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7925389

Sarantis, D., & Askounis, D. (2012). A systematic review of E-government ontologies. En WEBIST 2012 - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 585-588). https://n9.cl/s1lhq

Sarantis, D., Charalabidis, Y., & Askounis, D. (2011). Towards a public sector interoperability ontology: Conceptualization of fundamental entities. En Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 259-264). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2072069.2072112

Sheoran, S., & Vij, S. (2024). Mapping the intellectual ecosystem of e-government and e-governance: A bibliometric approach. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 20(3), 327-359. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2024.138165

Susar, D., & Aquaro, V. (2019). Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Challenges for the Public Sector. En Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 418-426). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326365.3326420

Tenesaca-Cuenca, A. Y., Plaza-Ponce, J. L., & Cañarte-Quimis, L. T. (2021). La administración pública y el manejo de la pandemia por coronavirus en Ecuador. Polo del Conocimiento, 6(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.23857/pc.v6i3.2485

Trujillo Sáez, F., & Álvarez Jiménez, D. (2021). Transformación digital de la administración pública: ¿Qué competencias necesitan los empleados públicos? Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, 49-67. https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.i27.10923

Trujillo Valdiviezo, G., Rodríguez Alegre, L., Mejía Ayala, D., & López Padilla, R. del P. (2022). Transformación digital en América Latina: Una revisión sistemática. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 27(100), Article 100. https://doi.org/10.52080/rvgluz.27.100.15

Tsohou, A., Lee, H., Irani, Z., Weerakkody, V., Osman, I. H., Anouze, A. L., & Medeni, T. (2013). Proposing a reference process model for the citizen‐centric evaluation of e‐government services. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 7(2), 240-255. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506161311325387

Wamba, S. F., Gumbo, S., Twinomurinzi, H., Bwalya, K., & Mpinganjira, M. (2023). Digital transformation under Covid-19: A Bibliometric Study and future research agenda. Procedia Computer Science, 219, 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.290

Welzel, C., Hartenstein, H., & Lucke, J. (2009). Advance Interoperability in e-Government with Standardized Core Directories. AMCIS 2009 Proceedings, 618. https://n9.cl/dw9q6

Yfantis, V., Ntalianis, K., & Ntalianis, F. (2020). Exploring the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: Welcome to the Clerkless Public Offices. Applications in Education. WSEAS Transactions on Advances in Engineering Education, 17, 76-79. https://doi.org/10.37394/232010.2020.17.9

Yusifov, F. (2016). Big Data in e-government: Issues, opportunities and prospects. European Conference on Digital Government, 352. https://n9.cl/d9h0t

Zaščirinska, K., Šuriņa, S., & Mārtinsone, K. (2024). Trends in dance/movement therapy research: A bibliometric analysis of publications in the Scopus bibliographic and citation information database. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 90, 102195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2024.102195

Zhang, L., Ling, J., & Lin, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence in renewable energy: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Energy Reports, 8, 14072-14088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.347

Zhang, W., & Wang, Y. (2008). Towards building a semantic grid for E-government applications. WSEAS Trans. Comp. Res., 3(4), 273-282. https://n9.cl/etr7f5

Zhu, J., & Liu, W. (2020). A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics, 123(1), 321-335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03387-8

Descargas

Publicado

2025-01-20

Cómo citar

López Naranjo, A. L., Uquillas Granizo, G. G., Jácome Lara, I. M., & Pérez Salas, F. P. (2025). La transformación digital en la administración pública: evolución y tendencias de investigación. Perspectivas Sociales Y Administrativas, 3(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.61347/psa.v3i1.74